![]()  | 
||||
|  
 | 
||||
|  
      
      
       LETTER 
        TO REP. ALLEN REGARDING FDA APPROVAL PROCESS 
 The Honorable Thomas 
        H. Allen Dear Representative Allen: It has come to our attention that you may be considering a proposed amendment to the Appropriations bill for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that would bar the agency from approving any new drug application that was not accompanied by prior written disclosure of the cost of the drug's development. According to your amendment, itemization of the drug's development cost must include data with respect to each stage of drug development, as well as specific information related to research funding from federal or state sources. As a community of organizations advocating for quality cancer care, we are concerned that your amendment constitutes a recipe for stalemate with industry and will cause delays in the approval of new medications for cancer. For people with cancer, stalemate and delay are unacceptable. The Congress has worked very hard to make the FDA approval process more accountable and more efficient. As a result of these changes and the dedication of the FDA's oncology review staff, a new life-extending anti-cancer drug for a rare blood cancer was recently approved in record time. Your amendment could place at risk the improvements in FDA procedures for reviewing new drugs.  Being very familiar 
        with the processes for funding and carrying out cancer research, we understand 
        that basic science research funded by the federal government most often 
        results in generalized information that could potentially make contributions 
        to many medical advances, including cancer. While we believe reporting 
        of research funding dollars and how they are spent in pursuit of these 
        new therapies is desirable, we believe your amendment, as written, would 
        not achieve that outcome and would have the unintended consequence of 
        a chilling effect on public/private research collaboration. We strongly 
        urge you to reconsider your proposed amendment and instead find some alternative 
        approach to achieving your goals with respect to reporting of research 
        funding. Cancer Leadership Council Alliance for Lung 
        Cancer Advocacy, Support, and Education 
 About CLC  |  What's New  |  Policy 
Issues  |  Participants' Login Copyright 
© 2001-2002 Cancer Leadership Council. All rights reserved.  | 
||||