CANCER LEADERSHIP COUNCIL
 
LETTER 
  TO REPRESENTATIVES & SENATORS IDENTIFYING 
  FLAWS IN CANCER CARE PROVISIONS OF MEDICARE BILLS
  (July 14, 2003)
July 14, 2003
  
  Dear Member of Congress:
The undersigned groups write 
  to express their grave concern over certain elements of the Medicare reform 
  legislation (S. 1, H.R. 1) now proceeding to Conference. While prescription 
  drug coverage is unquestionably a worthy goal, these bills also contain so-called 
  "provider givebacks" that are funded by catastrophic cuts in cancer 
  care. These excessive reductions must be modified or even abandoned until a 
  more balanced and reasonable approach can be identified.
The following facts should 
  give great pause to any Member of Congress asked to vote on the overall reform 
  package:
  - Both Senate and House 
    versions of the legislation would reduce payments for cancer care in a net 
    amount of over $500 million, or an estimated 30% reduction in current levels 
    of Medicare payment for cancer care in physician offices.
 
  - Although underpayments 
    for practice expense have been recognized as a problem for almost as long 
    as overpayments for drugs, neither bill addresses practice expense with a 
    legislative solution, but instead leaves resolution to the discretion of Centers 
    for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Thomas Scully, who has 
    already indicated his refusal to redress the shortfall in a satisfactory manner.
 
  - The Senate version continues 
    to rely on the discredited "average wholesale price," or AWP, methodology, 
    while the House version does not utilize AWP but gives oncologists equally 
    unacceptable choices.
 
  - Under the House bill, 
    oncologists must choose between reimbursement at 100% of average selling price, 
    or ASP (after a two-year transition during which payments would be 112% of 
    ASP), or receipt of drugs from a pharmacy supplier after competitive bidding. 
    Payments equal to ASP would be inadequate to cover the cost of acquiring drugs 
    for many physicians, and the competitive bidding drug supply system takes 
    the maintenance of a safe and appropriate supply of chemotherapy drugs out 
    of the hands of physicians. Cancer patients will be at risk if the integrity 
    of the drug supply is not ensured by physician control.
 
  - About 60% of all new 
    cancers diagnosed in any given year occur among Medicare beneficiaries. Community 
    oncologists provide the majority of care to Medicare patients diagnosed with 
    cancer. These oncologists are actively considering options to deal with the 
    anticipated cutbacks, including staff reductions among trained oncology nurses 
    and social workers, closing of satellite offices in outlying areas, and reconsideration 
    of their treatment of Medicare patients.
 
  - This Medicare reimbursement 
    issue will have an immediate effect on millions of cancer patients, as they 
    suffer inconvenience, delays, and other barriers to care. For patients in 
    rural areas, there may be a loss of access to care in the community.
 
  -  Cancer survivors are 
    also concerned about the long-term impact of these payment changes on cancer 
    research and the development of new treatments, as community oncologists will 
    find it economically impossible to participate in clinical research. 
 
  - 56 nationally recognized 
    cancer centers have written the President to warn that unsustainable cuts 
    in payment for cancer care will disrupt the country's comprehensive network 
    of clinical cancer trials by reducing the resources available to the community 
    physicians who are the backbone of the clinical trials infrastructure.
 
Our Nation's cancer care 
  is the envy of the world, but it cannot survive intact with such excessive overall 
  reductions. We urge you, all the Conferees and the President to reconsider this 
  course of action and to work with the cancer community to achieve a balanced 
  reform that addresses both overpayments for drugs and corresponding underpayment 
  for services.
Sincerely,
  
  Cancer Leadership Council
  
  American Cancer Society
  Association of American Cancer Institutes
  Cancer Care, Inc.
  Cancer Research and Prevention Foundation
  Coalition of National Cancer Cooperative Groups
  Colorectal Cancer Network
  International Myeloma Foundation
  The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
  Lymphoma Research Foundation
  Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation
  National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
  National Patient Advocate Foundation
  National Prostate Cancer Coalition
  North American Brain Tumor Coalition
  Ovarian Cancer National Alliance
  Pancreatic Cancer Action Network
  The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
  Us Too! International - Prostate Cancer Education and Support
  The Wellness Community
  Y-ME National Breast Cancer Organization