|   | 
      | 
     
          
      
      LETTER 
        TO REPRESENTATIVES & SENATORS IDENTIFYING  
        FLAWS IN CANCER CARE PROVISIONS OF MEDICARE BILLS 
        (July 14, 2003) 
       
       
       
      July 14, 2003 
         
        Dear Member of Congress: 
      The undersigned groups 
        write to express their grave concern over certain elements of the Medicare 
        reform legislation (S. 1, H.R. 1) now proceeding to Conference. While 
        prescription drug coverage is unquestionably a worthy goal, these bills 
        also contain so-called "provider givebacks" that are funded 
        by catastrophic cuts in cancer care. These excessive reductions must be 
        modified or even abandoned until a more balanced and reasonable approach 
        can be identified. 
      The following facts 
        should give great pause to any Member of Congress asked to vote on the 
        overall reform package: 
      
        - Both Senate and 
          House versions of the legislation would reduce payments for cancer care 
          in a net amount of over $500 million, or an estimated 30% reduction 
          in current levels of Medicare payment for cancer care in physician offices.
 
        - Although underpayments 
          for practice expense have been recognized as a problem for almost as 
          long as overpayments for drugs, neither bill addresses practice expense 
          with a legislative solution, but instead leaves resolution to the discretion 
          of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Thomas 
          Scully, who has already indicated his refusal to redress the shortfall 
          in a satisfactory manner.
 
        - The Senate version 
          continues to rely on the discredited "average wholesale price," 
          or AWP, methodology, while the House version does not utilize AWP but 
          gives oncologists equally unacceptable choices.
 
        - Under the House 
          bill, oncologists must choose between reimbursement at 100% of average 
          selling price, or ASP (after a two-year transition during which payments 
          would be 112% of ASP), or receipt of drugs from a pharmacy supplier 
          after competitive bidding. Payments equal to ASP would be inadequate 
          to cover the cost of acquiring drugs for many physicians, and the competitive 
          bidding drug supply system takes the maintenance of a safe and appropriate 
          supply of chemotherapy drugs out of the hands of physicians. Cancer 
          patients will be at risk if the integrity of the drug supply is not 
          ensured by physician control.
 
        - About 60% of all 
          new cancers diagnosed in any given year occur among Medicare beneficiaries. 
          Community oncologists provide the majority of care to Medicare patients 
          diagnosed with cancer. These oncologists are actively considering options 
          to deal with the anticipated cutbacks, including staff reductions among 
          trained oncology nurses and social workers, closing of satellite offices 
          in outlying areas, and reconsideration of their treatment of Medicare 
          patients.
 
        - This Medicare reimbursement 
          issue will have an immediate effect on millions of cancer patients, 
          as they suffer inconvenience, delays, and other barriers to care. For 
          patients in rural areas, there may be a loss of access to care in the 
          community.
 
        -  Cancer survivors 
          are also concerned about the long-term impact of these payment changes 
          on cancer research and the development of new treatments, as community 
          oncologists will find it economically impossible to participate in clinical 
          research. 
 
        - 56 nationally recognized 
          cancer centers have written the President to warn that unsustainable 
          cuts in payment for cancer care will disrupt the country's comprehensive 
          network of clinical cancer trials by reducing the resources available 
          to the community physicians who are the backbone of the clinical trials 
          infrastructure.
 
       
      Our Nation's cancer 
        care is the envy of the world, but it cannot survive intact with such 
        excessive overall reductions. We urge you, all the Conferees and the President 
        to reconsider this course of action and to work with the cancer community 
        to achieve a balanced reform that addresses both overpayments for drugs 
        and corresponding underpayment for services. 
      Sincerely, 
         
        Cancer Leadership Council 
         
        American Cancer Society 
        Association of American Cancer Institutes 
        Cancer Care, Inc. 
        Cancer Research and Prevention Foundation 
        Coalition of National Cancer Cooperative Groups 
        Colorectal Cancer Network 
        International Myeloma Foundation 
        The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society 
        Lymphoma Research Foundation 
        Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation 
        National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship 
        National Patient Advocate Foundation 
        National Prostate Cancer Coalition 
        North American Brain Tumor Coalition 
        Ovarian Cancer National Alliance 
        Pancreatic Cancer Action Network 
        The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation 
        Us Too! International - Prostate Cancer Education and Support 
        The Wellness Community 
        Y-ME National Breast Cancer Organization 
         
       
      
      Back 
        to Medicare Payment Index 
      
      
        
      About 
        CLC  |  What's New  |  
        Policy Issues  |  
        Participants' Login 
        Home  |  Sitemap 
         |  Contact Info 
      Copyright 
        © 2001-2002 Cancer Leadership Council. All rights reserved. 
        Please send comments and suggestions to webmaster@cancerleadership.org. 
         
         
     | 
      |